4.6 Article

A Comparative Performance Analysis of Popularity-Based Caching Strategies in Named Data Networking

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 50057-50077

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980385

关键词

Data dissemination; Data communication; Computer architecture; Internet of Things; Software defined networking; Licenses; Content centric networking; information-centric networking; named data networking; caching

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [2018R1A2B6002399]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data communication in the present Internet paradigm is dependent on fixed locations that disseminate similar data several times. As a result, the number of problems has been generated in which location dependency is the most crucial for communication. Therefore, Named Data Networking (NDN) is a new network architecture that revolutionized the handling gigantic amount of data generated from diverse locations. The NDN offers in-network cache which is the most beneficial feature to reduce the difficulties of location-based Internet paradigms. Moreover, it mitigates network congestion and provides a short stretch path in the data downloading procedure. The current study explores a new comparative analysis of popularity-based cache management strategies for NDN to find the optimal caching scheme to enhance the overall network performance. Therefore, the content popularity-based caching strategies are comparatively and extensively studied in an NDN-based simulation environment in terms of most significant metrics such as hit ratio, content diversity ratio, content redundancy, and stretch ratio. In this analysis, the Compound Popular Content Caching Strategy (CPCCS) has performed better in terms to enhance the overall NDN-based caching performance. Therefore, it is suggested that the CPCCS will perform better to achieve enhanced performance in emerging environments such as, Internet of Things (IoT), Fog computing, Edge computing, 5G, and Software Defined Network (SDN).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据