4.5 Article

Consumers' intentions to use online food delivery systems in the USA

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2019-0595

关键词

Mindfulness; Restaurants; Electronic commerce; Technology adoption; Delivery systems

资金

  1. Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals (HFTP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The recent development of online food delivery systems (OFDS) consolidated the restaurant industry's representation in the electronic distribution landscape. The purpose of this study is to examine consumers' intentions to use OFDS. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive structural model was developed based on UTAUT2 and extended the model with three additional constructs: impulse buying tendency, congruity with self-image and mindfulness. Data were collected from 605 US respondents. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to test the model. Findings Performance expectancy was the strongest predictor of intentions to use OFDS, followed by congruity with self-image. Low-magnitude predictors included habit and mindfulness, while impulse buying tendency had a negative impact on intentions to use OFDS. Research limitations/implications - The study validates a comprehensive yet parsimonious conceptual model that explains consumers' intentions to use OFDS. The model brings together constructs that capture the essence of the online food ordering tasks and the consumers' cognitive processes that inform such tasks. Practical implications - This study offers substantial practical implications for two types of practitioners: OFDS developers and restaurants and provides a mapping of the factors influencing consumers' intentions to use OFDS. Originality/value This study provides a first theoretical perspective on consumers' intentions to use OFDS, which have not been studied so far. Studying such intentions provides insight into consumers' adoption behaviors, which are critical to the success of OFDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据