4.5 Article

Benchmark calculations of pure neutron matter with realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 101, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.045801

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under FRIB Theory Alliance [DE-SC0013617]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under NUCLEI SciDAC program
  4. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report benchmark calculations of the energy per particle of pure neutron matter as a function of the baryon density using three independent many-body methods: Brueckner-Bethe-Goldstone, Fermi hypernetted chain/single-operator chain, and auxiliary-field diffusion Monte Carlo. Significant technical improvements are implemented in the latter two methods. The calculations are made for two distinct families of realistic coordinate-space nucleon-nucleon potentials fit to scattering data, including the standard Argonne upsilon(18) interaction and two of its simplified versions, and four of the new Norfolk Delta-full chiral effective field theory potentials. Primarily because of the advancements in the auxiliary-field diffusion Monte Carlo, we observe good agreement among the three many-body techniques up to nuclear saturation density-the maximum difference in the energy per particle is within 1.5 MeV for all the potentials we consider. At higher densities, the divergences become more important, and are mainly driven by the Fermi hypernetted chain/single-operator calculations. We also study the connection between nucleon-nucleon scattering data and the energy per particle of pure neutron matter. Our results suggest that fitting to higher-energy nucleon-nucleon scattering helps reduce the spread of energies among the models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据