4.6 Article

Gold nanoparticle decorated polypyrrole/graphene oxide nanosheets as a modified electrode for simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 4916-4926

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nj00166j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51271205, 50801070, 51571093]
  2. Project of Science and Technology Plan'' by Qingyuan city [DZXQY052, 2018C005, 2019A026]
  3. Project of results transformation achievement fund by Sun Yat-sen University [31000-18843232]
  4. Tian'e Plan'' by Huizhou city [20170220011822281, 20170220085037390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA) is always of vital importance for clinical diagnosis and healthcare. Hereby, a gold nanoparticle decorated polypyrrole/graphene oxide composite on carbon fiber paper (AuNPs@GO/PPy/CFP) was facilely prepared via a two-step method. Instead of reducing GO to rGO for better conductivity, GO was combined with PPy retaining its abundant oxygen containing functional groups, which is in favor of electrochemical sensing. The as-prepared electrode was evaluated in the simultaneous determination of AA, DA and UA. During the electro-oxidation of these analytes, three well-defined peaks with low overpotentials at -0.02 V, +0.16 V and +0.28 V were observed on the modified electrode. The linear response ranges obtained were 10-1600 mu M, 0.2-60 mu M and 2-360 mu M with the corresponding detection limits of 2.43 mu M, 0.115 mu M and 1.68 mu M (signal/noise = 3), respectively, for AA, DA and UA. This indicates that the as-prepared electrode has an excellent catalytic capability and high selectivity for the simultaneous determination of AA, DA and UA. In addition, the modified electrode showed satisfactory results when applied in real samples, suggesting the promising potential of AuNPs@GO/PPy/CFP for practical application in complex biological systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据