4.6 Article

Interactions between coherent twin boundaries and phase transition of iron under dynamic loading and unloading

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 122, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4997320

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-NSAF 11076012]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610824]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase transitions and deformation twins are constantly reported in many BCC metals under high pressure, whose interactions are of fundamental importance to understand the strengthening mechanism of these metals under extreme conditions. However, the interactions between twins and phase transition in BCC metals remain largely unexplored. In this work, interactions between coherent twin boundaries and alpha <-> epsilon phase transition of iron are investigated using both non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations and the nudged elastic band method. Mechanisms of both twin-assisted phase transition and reverse phase transition are studied, and orientation relationships between BCC and HCP phases are found to be < 11 (1) over bar >(BCC) parallel to <(1) over bar2 (1) over bar0 >(HCP) and < 1 (1) over bar0 >(BCC) parallel to < 0001 >(HCP) for both cases. The twin boundary corresponds to {10 (1) over bar0}(HCP) after the phase transition. It is amazing that the reverse transition seems to be able to memorize and recover the initial BCC twins. The memory would be partly lost when plastic slips take place in the HCP phase before the reverse transition. In the recovered initial BCC twins, three major twin spacings are observed, which are well explained in terms of energy barriers of transition from the HCP phase to the BCC twin. Besides, the variant selection rule of the twin assisted phase transition is also discussed. The results of present work could be expected to give some clues for producing ultra-fine grain structures in materials exhibiting martensitic phase transition. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据