4.6 Article

Antimicrobial activity of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole released from environmentally friendly nanostructured layered double hydroxides

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 122, 期 5, 页码 1207-1218

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13433

关键词

antimicrobials; bioluminescence; immobilized biocides; nanomaterials; triggered release

资金

  1. FCT [FCT UID/MAR/LA0017/2013, IF/00347/2013]
  2. CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007679 (FCT UID/CTM/50011/2013)]
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/89490/2012, SFRH/BD/88162/2012]
  4. FCT/MEC
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/89490/2012, SFRH/BD/88162/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsThe objective of this work was to assess the antibacterial effect of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), used as model-biocide, immobilized in a layered double hydroxide (LDH) structure, under different conditions of pH and salinity, envisaging possible applications of the system in active antifouling and anticorrosion coatings. Methods and ResultsBiological effects of MBT immobilized in LDH were assessed by monitoring bacterial bioluminescence of cell suspensions of either Allivibrio fischeri or a recombinant strain of Escherichia coli, as a proxy for bacterial activity. Salinity (1, 2 and 3% NaCl) and pH (4, 5, 6 and 7) of the suspension media were experimentally manipulated and biocide release tests were performed in parallel. The release profiles obtained by UV-visible spectrophotometry indicated a fast release of biocide from MBT@LDH, slightly enhanced in 3% NaCl and under alkaline conditions. However, biological effects were more pronounced at 1% NaCl and at neutral pH. ConclusionsThe release and toxic effect of MBT immobilized in LDH is dependent on the concentration of solutes in the suspension medium. Significance and Impact of the StudyThe results confirm LDH as a biologically compatible material with potential to be used for biocide delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据