4.6 Review

Environmental Escherichia coli: ecology and public health implicationsa review

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 123, 期 3, 页码 570-581

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13468

关键词

ecology; Escherichia coli; fecal indicator bacteria; public health; water quality

资金

  1. University of Minnesota's Discovery, Research and InnoVation Economy (MnDRIVE) initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Escherichia coli is classified as a rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacterium in the family Enterobacteriaceae. The bacterium mainly inhabits the lower intestinal tract of warm-blooded animals, including humans, and is often discharged into the environment through faeces or wastewater effluent. The presence of E.coli in environmental waters has long been considered as an indicator of recent faecal pollution. However, numerous recent studies have reported that some specific strains of E.coli can survive for long periods of time, and potentially reproduce, in extraintestinal environments. This indicates that E.coli can be integrated into indigenous microbial communities in the environment. This naturalization phenomenon calls into question the reliability of E.coli as a faecal indicator bacterium (FIB). Recently, many studies reported that E.coli populations in the environment are affected by ambient environmental conditions affecting their long-term survival. Large-scale studies of population genetics revealed the diversity and complexity of E.coli strains in various environments, which are affected by multiple environmental factors. This review examines the current knowledge on the ecology of E.coli strains in various environments with regard to its role as a FIB and as a naturalized member of indigenous microbial communities. Special emphasis is given on the growth ofpathogenic E.coli in the environment, and the population genetics of environmental members of the genus Escherichia. The impact of environmental E.coli on water quality and public health is also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据