4.6 Article

16S rRNA gene sequencing on a benchtop sequencer: accuracy for identification of clinically important bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 1584-1596

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13590

关键词

16S rRNA gene; accuracy; bacterial identification; benchtop sequencer; sensitivity

资金

  1. Southwest Environmental Health Sciences Center, NIEHS grant [ES06694]
  2. Arizona Cancer Center, NIH grant [CA23074]
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF4733, GBMF4491]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Test the choice of 16S rRNA gene amplicon and data analysis method on the accuracy of identification of clinically important bacteria utilizing a benchtop sequencer. Methods and Results: Nine 16S rRNA amplicons were tested on an Ion Torrent PGM to identify 41 strains of clinical importance. The V1-V2 region identified 40 of 41 isolates to the species level. Three data analysis methods were tested, finding that the Ribosomal Database Project's SequenceMatch outperformed BLAST and the Ion Reporter Metagenomics analysis pipeline. Lastly, 16S rRNA gene sequencing mixtures of four species through a six log range of dilution showed species were identifiable even when present as 0.1% of the mixture. Conclusions: Sequencing the V1-V2 16S rRNA gene region, made possible by the increased read length Ion Torrent PGM sequencer's 400 base pair chemistry, may be a better choice over other commonly used regions for identifying clinically important bacteria. In addition, the SequenceMatch algorithm, freely available from the Ribosomal Database Project, is a good choice for matching filtered reads to organisms. Lastly, 16S rRNA gene sequencing's sensitivity to the presence of a bacterial species at 0.1% of a mixture suggests it has sufficient sensitivity for samples in which important bacteria may be rare. Significance and Impact of the Study: We have validated 16S rRNA gene sequencing on a benchtop sequencer including simple mixtures of organisms; however, our results highlight deficits for clinical application in place of current identification methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据