4.4 Article

Toward Generalizing the Impact of Surface Heating, Stratification, and Terrain Geometry on the Daytime Heat Export from an Idealized Valley

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
卷 56, 期 10, 页码 2711-2727

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0378.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P23918-N21]
  2. University of Innsbruck
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P23918] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 23918] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The convective export of heat from different types of idealized valleys for fair-weather daytime conditions is studied with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The goal is to test the hypothesis that the total export of heat over the course of the day depends on a so-called breakup parameter B. The breakup parameter is the ratio between the energy required to neutralize the initially stably stratified valley atmosphere and the total energy provided by the surface sensible heat flux. To achieve this goal, simulations with different surface heating, initial stability, and terrain geometry are performed. The fraction of the sensible heat provided at the surface that is exported at crest height over the course of the day depends exponentially on B. The effects of variations of the valley width, crest height, forcing amplitude, and initial stratification on the total export of heat can be described by this function. The complete neutralization of the stratification in the valley is never reached if B exceeds a critical value of about 0.65 for an initially constant stratification. For a valley geometry with linear slopes and sharp crests, up to 60% of the provided heat is exported for the strongest forcing and the weakest stability (i.e., B approximate to 0.1), whereas less than 5% is exported for B > 0.65. The minimum heat export for larger B is higher for rounded crests (10%) and for a deep residual layer that extends to above crest height (17%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据