4.5 Article

Hematopoietic recovery of acute radiation syndrome by human superoxide dismutase-expressing umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells

期刊

CYTOTHERAPY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 403-417

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.11.011

关键词

acute radiation syndrome; apoptosis; hematopoietic failure; stem cell; superoxide dismutase; umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells

资金

  1. Shenzhen Research and Development grants [ZD201111080130A, CXY201107010176A, JSGG20130917151830203]
  2. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [RT2-01942]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1R43 CA103553-01]
  4. Department of Defense [W81XWH-04-1-0597]
  5. Jilin International Collaboration Grant [20120720]
  6. NSFC [81272294]
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R43CA103553] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background aims. Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) leads to pancytopenia and multi-organ failure. Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells provides a curative option for radiation-induced aplasia, but this therapy is limited by donor availability. Methods. We examined an alternative therapeutic approach to ARS with the use of human extracellular superoxide dismutase (ECSOD)-modified umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells (UCMSCs). This treatment combines the unique regenerative role of UCMSCs with the anti-oxidative activity of ECSOD. Results. We demonstrated that systemically administered ECSOD-UCMSCs are able to protect mice from sub-lethal doses of radiation and improve survival by promoting multilineage hematopoietic recovery. The therapeutic effect of this treatment is related to the decrease in radiation-induced O-2(-) and apoptosis. Conclusions. Our data highlight the clinical potential of this two-pronged approach to the treatment of ARS, thereby serving as a rapid and effective first-line strategy to combat the hematopoietic failure resulting from a radiation accident, nuclear terrorism and other radiologic emergencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据