4.7 Article

Enhanced Ionic Transport and Structural Stability of Nb-Doped O3-NaFe0.55Mn0.45-xNbxO2 Cathode Material for Long-Lasting Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 3770-3778

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c00238

关键词

sodium-ion battery; cathode; O3-layered metal oxides; niobium; dope

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971146, 51671135, 51971147]
  2. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [17XD1403000]
  3. Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leaders Plan
  4. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2019-01-07-00-07-E00015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are promising candidates for inexpensive and sustainable energy storage devices for the widespread utilization of intermittent renewable energy because of the natural abundance of sodium raw materials. However, since the ionic radius of Na+ is inherently larger than that of Li+, Na-based intercalation materials often suffer from poor stability and slow reaction kinetics. Regarding SIB cathodes, layered transition metals oxides (NaxTMO2) show promising theoretical capacities but low stability. In this work, a series of NaFe0.55Mn0.45-xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.03) compounds are synthesized and show superior stability and rate-capability compared with the pure oxide. For instance, the best-performing sample, NaFe0.55Mn0.45-xNbxO2, has a specific capacity of 127 mAh g(-1) and 80% capacity retention over 100 cycles at 0.1 C. Ex situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) result shows that the Nb incorporation could suppress TMO2 slip and reduce the energy barrier of the O3-P3 phases' transition. When coupled with a hard carbon (HC) anode in a full cell, the battery exhibits significant weight and volume energy and power densities. It is believed that Nb-doping enlarges lattice spacing of the oxide and partially reduces Mn's to Mil's, increasing the ionic conductivity of the cathodic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据