4.7 Article

Long-terms effects of irrigation with treated municipal wastewater on soil, yield and olive oil quality

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 14-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.023

关键词

Treated wastewater; Soil characteristics; Olive tree yields; Virgin olive oil composition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Tunisia, water scarcity is one of the major constraints for agricultural activities. The reuse of treated wastewater (TWW) in agriculture can be a sustainable solution to face water scarcity. The research was conducted for a period of ten years in an olive orchard planted on a sandy-silty soil and subjected to two different irrigation treatments: (a) well water (WW) and (b) treated wastewater (TWIN). The main aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of irrigation with TWW on soil chemical properties, olive tree yield and on virgin olive oil (VOO) quality during an heavy crop year (on year) in Chemlali olive orchard. Soil samples were collected at the beginning of the study (before irrigation), after five and ten years for each treatment. pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter, major elements, salts and heavy metals contents in soil were investigated. Standard quality parameters, chlorophyll, beta-carotene, total phenols (TP), induction time and total tocopherols such as alpha-,beta-,gamma-,delta-tocopherol of VOOs were also investigated. Results showed that irrigation with TWW increased soil pH, EC, OM, major elements, salts and heavy metals contents. Data obtained indicated that standard quality indices (free acidity, K-232, and K-270) of VOO and oil content were not affected significantly by water quality. Instead, chlorophyll, total phenols, induction time and delta-tocopherol values decreased significantly after ten years of irrigation with TWW. However, both fruit water content, and the concentrations of P-carotene and tocopherols (alpha, beta and gamma) in VOO increased. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据