4.6 Article

Temperature-induced structural change through the glass transition of silicate glass by neutron diffraction

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 101, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.134106

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1928538]
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-FG02-13ER41967]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1928538] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1928538] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercooled silicate liquids exhibit several orders of magnitude increase in viscosity at the glass-transition temperature (T-g) towards the glassy state. Such a drastic dynamical slowdown leads to an abrupt change in the slope of temperature-dependent thermodynamic properties because the measurements reflect the equilibrium-to-nonequilibrium change from liquid to glass. However, an underlying structural change associated with such a transition remains elusive. For instance, understanding the structural origin of the variation in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of silicate glasses upon vitrification is critical for glass-manufacturing processes and applications. Here, based on temperature-dependent neutron diffraction, we demonstrate that the temperature dependences of both short- and medium-range order structural parameters show a pronounced change of slope at T-g for a range of silicate glasses of industrial importance. Interestingly, the short- and medium-range order structural parameters are found to be mutually correlated, both below and above T-g. Based on these results, we find that the slope change of the area of the first sharp diffraction peak at T-g is correlated with the extent of the CTE jump at T-g, which offers a structural origin for the discontinuity in the CTE of glasses at T-g. This study can therefore shine light on solving critical industrial problems, such as glass relaxation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据