4.7 Article

Determining β-lactam exposure threshold to suppress resistance development in Gram-negative bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 1421-1428

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx001

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [FP7-HEALTH-2013-INNOVATION-1, 602906]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: beta-Lactams are commonly used for nosocomial infections and resistance to these agents among Gram-negative bacteria is increasing rapidly. Optimized dosing is expected to reduce the likelihood of resistance development during antimicrobial therapy, but the target for clinical dose adjustment is not well established. We examined the likelihood that various dosing exposures would suppress resistance development in an in vitro hollow-fibre infection model. Methods: Two strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and two strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (baseline inocula of similar to 10(8) cfu/mL) were examined. Various dosing exposures of cefepime, ceftazidime and meropenem were simulated in the hollow-fibre infection model. Serial samples were obtained to ascertain the pharmacokinetic simulations and viable bacterial burden for up to 120 h. Drug concentrations were determined by a validated LC-MS/MS assay and the simulated exposures were expressed as C-min/MIC ratios. Resistance development was detected by quantitative culture on drug-supplemented media plates (at 3% the corresponding baseline MIC). The C-min/MIC breakpoint threshold to prevent bacterial regrowth was identified by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Results: For all strains, the bacterial burden declined initially with the simulated exposures, but regrowth was observed in 9 out of 31 experiments. CART analysis revealed that a C-min/MIC ratio >= 3.8 was significantly associated with regrowth prevention (100% versus 44%, P = 0.001). Conclusions: The development of beta-lactamresistance during therapy could be suppressed by an optimized dosing exposure. Validation of the proposed target in a well-designed clinical study is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据