4.6 Article

What is many-body dispersion and should I worry about it?

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 22, 期 16, 页码 8266-8276

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01213k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Walter C. Sumner Foundation
  3. Spanish government [RyC-2016-20301, PGC2018-097520-A-100, RED2018-102612-T]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inclusion of dispersion effects in density-functional calculations is now standard practice in computational chemistry. In many dispersion models, the dispersion energy is written as a sum of pairwise atomic interactions consisting of a damped asymptotic expansion from perturbation theory. There has been much recent attention drawn to the importance of many-body dispersion effects, which by their name imply limitations with a pairwise atomic expansion. In this perspective, we clarify what is meant by many-body dispersion, as this term has previously referred to two very different physical phenomena, here classified as electronic and atomic many-body effects. Atomic many-body effects refer to the terms in the perturbation-theory expansion of the dispersion energy involving more than two atoms, the leading contribution being the Axilrod-Teller-Muto three-body term. Conversely, electronic many-body effects refer to changes in the dispersion coefficients of the pairwise terms induced by the atomic environment. Regardless of their nature, many-body effects cause pairwise non-additivity in the dispersion energy, such that the dispersion energy of a system does not equal the sum of the dispersion energies of its atomic pairs taken in isolation. A series of examples using the exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) method are presented to assess the relative importance of electronic and atomic many-body effects on the dispersion energy. Electronic many-body effects can result in variation in the leading-order C-6 dispersion coefficients by as much as 50%; hence, their inclusion is critical for good performance of a pairwise asymptotic dispersion correction. Conversely, atomic many-body effects represent less than 1% of the total dispersion energy and are much less significant than higher-order (C-8 and C-10) pairwise terms. Their importance has been previously overestimated through empirical fitting, where they can offset underlying errors stemming either from neglect of higher-order pairwise terms or from the base density functional.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据