4.7 Article

Breast cancer-derived exosomes transmit lncRNA SNHG16 to induce CD73+γδ1 Treg cells

期刊

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-020-0129-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project [2019RC040, 2017KY233]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81773065, 81520108024]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR19H160001, LY17C080001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

gamma delta T cells have been reported to exert immunosuppressive functions in multiple solid malignant diseases, but their immunosuppressive functional subpopulation in breast cancer (BC) is still undetermined. Here, we collected 40 paired BC and normal tissue samples from Chinese patients for analysis. First, we showed that gamma delta T1 cells comprise the majority of CD3+ T cells in BC; next, we found that CD73+gamma delta T1 cells were the predominant regulatory T-cell (Treg) population in BC, and that their prevalence in peripheral blood was also related to tumour burden. In addition, CD73+gamma delta T1 cells exert an immunosuppressive effect via adenosine generation. We also found that BC could modulate CD73 expression on gamma delta T cells in a non-contact manner. The microarray analysis and functional experiments indicated that breast tumour cell-derived exosomes (TDEs) could transmit lncRNA SNHG16, which upregulates CD73 expression, to V delta 1 T cells. Regarding the mechanism, SNHG16 served as a ceRNA by sponging miR-16-5p, which led to the derepression of its target gene SMAD5 and resulted in potentiation of the TGF-beta 1/SMAD5 pathway to upregulate CD73 expression in V delta 1 T cells. Our results showed that the BC-derived exosomal SNHG16/miR-16-5p/SMAD5-regulatory axis potentiates TGF-beta 1/SMAD5 pathway activation, thus inducing CD73 expression in V delta 1 T cells. Our results first identify the significance of CD73+V delta 1 Tregs in BC, and therapy targeting this subpopulation or blocking TDEs might have potential for BC treatment in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据