4.7 Article

The online coupling of high performance liquid chromatography with atomic fluorescence spectrometry based on dielectric barrier discharge induced chemical vapor generation for the speciation of mercury

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 678-685

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ja00421k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41673014, 21375120]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University from the Ministry of Education [NCET-13-1015]
  3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2014DFA20720]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602385]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on a novel green dielectric barrier discharge plasma induced chemical vapor generation (DBD plasma-CVG), an on-line hyphenation of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) was developed for the speciation of inorganic mercury (Hg2+), methylmercury (MeHg) and ethylmercury (EtHg). Without the use of other chemical reagents, the decomposition of organic mercury species and the reduction of Hg2+ could be completed in one step with the DBD plasma-CVG system. The operating parameters of DBD plasma-CVG and HPLC were optimized. Separation of mercury species was accomplished in less than 14 min on a ZORBAX SB-C18 separation column with a mobile phase containing 0.01% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% (v/v) methanol and 0.06 mol L-1 NH4Ac at pH 6.8. The limits of detection of the method were found to be 1.6, 0.42 and 0.75 mu g L-1 for Hg2+, MeHg and EtHg, respectively. The developed method was validated by determination of the main analytical figures of merit and applied to the analysis of the certified reference material GBW10029 (tuna fish). The on-line interfacing of HPLC with DBD plasma-CVG-AFS for the speciation of mercury is simple, environmentally friendly, and represents an attractive alternative to the conventional tetrahydroborate interface system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据