4.7 Article

Thermo-kinetic, spectroscopic study of brewer's spent grains and characterisation of their pyrolysis products

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.09.009

关键词

Brewer's spent grains; Pyrolysis; Kinetic behaviours; Product characterisation; Transesterification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brewer's spent grains, major by-products of the beverage industries, were obtained from a Nigerian brewery and subjected to pyrolysis at 500 T. Analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC/MS) was conducted on the original BSG, extractive free BSG and BSG CH2Cl2 extract. There was a marked difference in the concentration of levoglucosan between the extractive-free BSG (40.5%) and the original BSG (11.5%). The Py-GC/MS detected significant amount of palmitic and oleic acids in the three samples. Prior to pyrolysis, the extractives content were isolated through methanolysis, transesterified and subjected to GC/MS analysis. The analysis revealed the presence of linoleic, oleic and palmitic acids in an appreciable quantity. The BSG and its biochar were also characterised according to Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectroscopic, and thermogravimetric analyses alongside some conventional physico-chemical analysis. The total crystallinity and condensation indices were evaluated from specific FTIR spectra peaks so as to monitor structural transformations in the bio-char. Kinetic data were deduced from TGA measurements and it was apparent that thermal decomposition of BSG is better modelled as a multi-step reaction mechanism. The nitrogen content of the bio-char was relatively high making it a suitable feedstock for the production of in situ nitrogenised activated bio-carbon. There was a significant variation between the structural configuration of the original BSG and the bio-char as revealed by the change in the value of the condensation index as well as the cellulose crystallinity content. It may thus be concluded that the BSG biomass would be a viable feedstock for thermal decomposition and other valorisation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据