4.7 Article

Catalytic pyrolysis of recalcitrant, insoluble humin byproducts from C6 sugar biorefineries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 134-143

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2016.12.014

关键词

Pyrolysis; Humins; Catalyst; HZSM-5; Aromatics; Biobased chemicals

资金

  1. Smart Mix Program of the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation
  2. Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science [053.70.358]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humins are solid by-products formed during the acid-catalysed conversions of C-6 sugars to platform chemicals like hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid. We here report an experimental study on the liquefaction/depolymerisation of humins using catalytic pyrolysis. Synthetic humins (SH) and crude industrial humins (CIH, including purified industrial (PIH) samples) from the acid-catalysed conversion of C-6 sugars to HMF/LA were tested. Thermal degradation patterns of both humin types vary significantly. Major thermal decomposition of the industrial humins was observed between 50 and 650 degrees C (weight loss approx. 66 wt%), whereas, major weight loss was observed between 200 and 800 degrees C for the synthetic humins (47 wt%). A series of catalytic pyrolysis tests with synthetic humins and different zeolites were performed using a PTV-GC/MS (humin to catalyst wt ratio of 0.2, 550 degrees C). Best results were obtained using HZSM-5 (SiO2/Al2O3=50). For quantitative analysis, a gram scale pyrolysis unit was used, giving a product oil (9-11 wt% on humin intake) with approximately 1.5 and 10 wt% aromatics from synthetic and crude industrial humins, respectively. GPC data on the product oils clearly shows the breakdown of the humin structure into low molecular weight species. The HHV value of the liquid products (up to 41 MJ kg(-1)) is considerably higher than that of the crude industrial humin feed (21-24 MJkg(-1)). (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据