4.5 Article

Late Onset Alzheimer's Disease Risk Variants in Cognitive Decline: The PATH Through Life Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 423-436

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160774

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; cognitive aging; genetic epidemiology; genetic risk scores; longitudinal studies; single nucleotide polymorphisms

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [973302, 179805, 1002160]
  2. NHMRC Dementia Collaborative Research Centres from the Australian Research Council [CE110001029]
  3. NHMRC [1043256]
  4. NHMRC Research Fellowship [1002560]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent genome wide association studies have identified a number of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with late onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). We examined the associations of 24 LOAD risk loci, individually and collectively as a genetic risk score, with cognitive function. We used data from 1,626 non-demented older Australians of European ancestry who were examined up to four times over 12 years on tests assessing episodic memory, working memory, vocabulary, and information processing speed. Linear mixed models were generated to examine associations between genetic factors and cognitive performance. Twelve SNPs were significantly associated with baseline cognitive performance (ABCA7, MS4A4E, SORL1), linear rate of change (APOE, ABCA7, INPP5D, ZCWPW1, CELF1), or quadratic rate of change (APOE, CLU, EPHA1, HLA-DRB5, INPP5D, FERMT2). In addition, a weighted genetic risk score was associated with linear rate of change in episodic memory and information processing speed. Our results suggest that a minority of AD related SNPs may be associated with non-clinical cognitive decline. Further research is required to verify these results and to examine the effect of preclinical AD in genetic association studies of cognitive decline. The identification of LOAD risk loci associated with non-clinical cognitive performance may help in screening for individuals at greater risk of cognitive decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据