4.5 Article

Aphasia in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: As Severe as Progressive Non-Fluent Aphasia

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 705-715

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170743

关键词

Clinicopathological correlation; primary progressive aphasia; progressive non-fluent aphasia; progressive supranuclear palsy

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) program grant [1037746]
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Memory Node [CE110001021]
  3. University of New South Wales
  4. Neuroscience Research Australia
  5. NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [1072451]
  6. ARC Future Fellowship [FT120100355]
  7. NHMRC [1079679]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Adynamic speech is characteristic of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), but higher language deficits have been reported inconsistently, in the context of clinical and pathological overlaps with progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA). Objective: The present study tested two hypotheses: 1) PSP and PNFA display impaired single word repetition, object naming, semantic knowledge, and syntactic comprehension; and 2) PSP have reduced speed on timed cognitive tasks. Methods: Structured clinical and neuropsychological assessments of language were performed on patients with clinically defined PSP and PNFA. Language was tested using the Sydney Language Battery (SYDBAT) and the Test of Reception of Grammar (TROG). Results: In total, 144 participants were studied (PSP 22, PNFA29, and Control 93). PSP patients had prominent eyemovement abnormalities, parkinsonism, and falls. All 4 PSP patients who underwent postmortem examination had 4-Repeat tauopathy, with PSP pathology in 3. The frequency and severity of impairment on the SYDBAT (naming, word comprehension, semantic association), and TROG (syntactic comprehension) did not differ between PSP and PNFA, but PSP were significantly slower on timed non-language cognitive tests. Conclusion: Tested formally, aphasia may be seen in PSP, with a severity similar to that seen in PNFA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据