4.5 Article

One-Year Evolution of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Patients Initially Hospitalized in Cognitive Behavioral Units: The EVITAL Prospective Cohort

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 147-155

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-161023

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; behavioral disorders; BPSD; dementia; longitudinal study

资金

  1. French Ministry of Health, via Rhone-Alpes Regional Health Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The 2008-2012 French Alzheimer's Plan has provided hospital Cognitive and Behavioral Units (CBU) to improve the management of patients with productive behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Little is known concerning the behavioral outcome of these patients after discharge. Objective: The present study investigated the long-term evolution of BPSD over one year after CBU discharge. Methods: The EVITAL cohort included 221 participants admitted to the CBUs of 3 French hospitals. BPSD were collected using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at admission and 3, 6, and 12 months after hospitalization. The global NPI score evolution was assessed using a linear mixed-effect model. A four-factor model of the NPI including behavioral dyscontrol, psychosis, mood, and agitation subscores was also analyzed. Results: Our analysis focused on 148 patients followed up during 12 months and evaluated at each visit. The global NPI score was 48.5 (SD 21.7) at baseline, 28.8 (SD 18.7) at 3-month, 23.2 (SD 16.4) at 6-month and 20.9 (SD 15.9) at 12-month follow-up. The score significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up (F = 109.3 p < 0.0001). Moreover, the decrease was observed for each NPI subscores. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale score was significantly linked to the baseline NPI score (t = 2.76, p = 0.009). Conversely, the NPI decline was observed whatever the CDR level. Conclusion: The present study showed a decrease in the global NPI score and all its subscores during the year following the CBU hospitalization, regardless of the initial CDR score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据