4.7 Article

Flaky core-shell particles of iron@iron oxides for broadband microwave absorbers in S and C bands

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 709, 期 -, 页码 735-741

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.197

关键词

Microwave absorber; Mechanical milling; In-suit oxidation; Filling capability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51577138, 51603158, 51521001]
  2. Top Talents Lead Cultivation Project
  3. Innovative Group Project of Hubei Province [2015CFA003]
  4. Yellow Crane talent plan of Wuhan municipal government
  5. Equipment Development Pre-research Shared Technology [9140A12040211JB34]
  6. Intra-system Research [609]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper has developed a two-step process integrating mechanical milling with heat-treatment for the preparation of flaky core-shell particles of iron@iron oxides, which show large electromagnetic parameters but low dielectric loss when dispersed at a maximum filling ratio in a dielectric matrix, resulting in broad-band and strong absorption in S and C bands as a thin microwave absorbing material. In this process, prolonging the milling time increases the aspect ratio and specific surface area of the CIPs. This greatly enhances the intrinsic electromagnetic parameters but simultaneously reduces the filling capability in composites, resulting in the occurrence of the largest permeability of the composites at a moderate aspect ratio of the CIPs. The subsequent heat-treatment in air makes surface in-situ oxidation of the flaky CIPs, dramatically decreasing the dielectric loss while keeping the high permeability due to the formation of a Fe3O4 and alpha-FeOOH shell. Consequently, the as-designed composites with flaky CIPs may exhibit reflection loss (RL) < -6 dB in 2.5-8 GHz and a minimum RL of -11 dB at 4 GHz when the thickness is 1.2 mm. This work provides an effective and convenient route to prepare a high performance thin absorber in low frequency region. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据