4.7 Article

High High emissivity MoSi2-TaSi2-borosilicate glass porous coating for fibrous ZrO2 ceramic by a rapid sintering method

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 690, 期 -, 页码 63-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.073

关键词

High emissivity coating; Fibrous ceramic; Rapid sintering method; Thermal shock behavior

资金

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_15R35]
  2. Industry Program of Science and Technology Support Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2014128]
  3. National Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [201452T4001]
  4. Major Program of Natural Science Fund in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province [15KJA430005]
  5. Prospective Joint Research Program of Jiangsu Province [BY2015005-01]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) - China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A MoSi2-TaSi2-borosilicate glass porous coating was designed and prepared on fibrous ZrO2 ceramic with slurry dipping and subsequent rapid sintering method. The microstructure, radiative property and thermal shock behavior of the coating have been investigated. The results show the coating presents a top Ta-Si-O compound glass layer and a porous MoSi2-TaSi2-borosilicate glass inner layer. The total emissivity of the coating is up to 0.88 in the range of 0.3-2.5 mu m and 0.87 in the range of 2.5-15 mu m at room temperature. The increased surface roughness leads to the increased emissivity, which can be explained by V-shaped grooves model. The coating turns into a dense structure and presents an interlocking structure in the interfacial layer after thermal cycling between 1673 K and room temperature 10 times, exhibiting excellent thermal shock resistance, which was attributed to the synergistic effect of porous structure and the match of thermal expansion coefficient between the coating and substrate. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据