4.2 Article

Consensus Guidelines on Plasma Cell Myeloma Minimal Residual Disease Analysis and Reporting

期刊

CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 31-39

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21228

关键词

plasma cell myeloma; minimal residual disease; flow cytometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Major heterogeneity between laboratories in flow cytometry (FC) minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma (MM) must be overcome. Cytometry societies such as the International Clinical Cytometry Society and the European Society for Clinical Cell Analysis recognize a strong need to establish minimally acceptable requirements and recommendations to perform such complex testing. Methods: A group of 11 flow cytometrists currently performing FC testing in MM using different instrumentation, panel designs (>= 6-color) and analysis software compared the procedures between their respective laboratories and reviewed the literature to propose a consensus guideline on flow-MRD analysis and reporting in MM. Results/Conclusion: Consensus guidelines support i) the use of minimum of five initial gating parameters (CD38, CD138, CD45, forward, and sideward light scatter) within the same aliquot for accurate identification of the total plasma cell compartment; ii) the analysis of potentially aberrant phenotypic markers and to report the antigen expression pattern on neoplastic plasma cells as being reduced, normal or increased, when compared to a normal reference plasma cell immunophenotype (obtained using the same instrument and parameters); and iii) the percentage of total bone marrow plasma cells plus the percentages of both normal and neoplastic plasma cells within the total bone marrow plasma cell compartment, and over total bone marrow cells. Consensus guidelines on minimal current and future MRD analyses should target a lower limit of detection of 0.001%, and ideally a limit of quantification of 0.001%, which requires at least 3 X 10(6) and 5 X 10(6) bone marrow cells to be measured, respectively. (C) 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据