4.7 Article

Organometallic ciprofloxacin conjugates with dual action: synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial and cytotoxicity studies

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 1403-1415

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9dt03948a

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union from the European Regional Development Fund under the Operational Programme Innovative Economy, 2007-2013
  2. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)
  3. University of Lodz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis, characterization and biological activity of six bioorganometallic conjugates of ciprofloxacin with ferrocenyl, ruthenocenyl and cymantrenyl entities are described. Their antimicrobial activities were investigated against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Furthermore, the morphological changes of bacterial cells upon treatment with the conjugates were examined by scanning electron microscopy. In addition, the cytotoxicity of the conjugates against tumor and normal mammalian cells was also investigated. The results showed that conjugation of an organometallic moiety can significantly enhance the antimicrobial activity of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin drug. It was found that N-alkyl cymantrenyl and ruthenocenyl ciprofloxacin conjugates were the most effective derivatives although other conjugates also showed significant antimicrobial activity. The increase in the antimicrobial activity was most likely due to two independent mechanisms of action. The first mechanism is due to the bacterial topoisomerase inhibitory activity of ciprofloxacin while the second mechanism can be attributed to the generation of reactive oxygen species caused by the organometallic moiety. The presence of two modes of action enables the conjugates to kill bacteria in their stationary growth phase and to overcome the drug resistance of S. aureus strains. In addition, the conjugates showed promising selectivity toward bacterial and parasitic cells over mammalian cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据