4.7 Article

Performance improvement of all-solid-state Li-S batteries with optimizing morphology and structure of sulfur composite electrode

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 723, 期 -, 页码 787-794

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.135

关键词

All solid state lithium batteries; Li-S batteries; Composite electrode

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2015R1A1A1A05001187]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20163030031850]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A1A1A05001187] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-solid-state Li-S batteries are fabricated with lithium silicide anodes (Li4.4Si), sulfide-based glass electrolyte (Li2S-P2S5), and sulfur composite (sulfur + acetylene black + solid electrolyte) cathode. Various preparation methods, such as mortar mixing (MM), ball milling (BM), and secondary ball milling (SBM), are applied for the sulfur composite cathode. By changing the preparation methods from MM to SBM, the electrode morphology and the electrolyte/cathode interfacial area are significantly improved, as confirmed with BET, SEM/EDS, and GITT analyses. These effects are reflected in the charge-discharge tests, resulting in higher capacity of the SBM cell. Pyrolytic graphite sheet (PGS) is employed for the gradient structure of the sulfur composite cathode, and the cell with PGS shows higher volumetric capacity and equivalent gravimetric capacity than do cells with the conventional cathode structure. This is because the cathode thickness is reduced and the electron transport to/from the current collector is facilitated. Thus, the present work indicates that design and preparation of the electrode greatly affects the performance of solid state batteries with sulfur composite cathodes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据