4.7 Article

Waved 2D Transition-Metal Disulfides for Nanodevices and Catalysis: A First-Principle Study

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 2804-2812

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.0c00119

关键词

waved 2D materials; transition-metal disulfides; strain engineering; electronic and magnetic properties; hydrogen evolution reaction; DFT calculations

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund from Macau SAR [0102/2019/A2, 0035/2019/AGJ, 084/2016/A2, 199/2017/A3, 0125/2018/A3]
  2. Research & Development Office at University of Macau [MYRG2017-00027-FST, MYRG2018-00003-IAPME, MYRG2017-00149-FST, SRG2016-00085-FST]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) monolayers have found various applications spanning from electronics in physics to catalysis in chemistry due to their unique physical and chemical properties. Here, the effect of structure engineering on the physical and chemical properties of transition-metal disulfide monolayers (MS2) is systematically investigated based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The calculation results show that waved MS2 (w-MS2) can be achieved under compression due to the zero in-plane stiffness, leading to high flexibility within a wide range of compression. The bandgap and conductivity of semi-conducting w-MS2 are reduced because the d orbitals of transition-metal elements become more localized as the curvature increases. A transition from a direct band to an indirect one is observed in w-MoS2 and w-WS2 after a critical strain. We further demonstrate the structure engineering can modulate the magnetism of w-VS2, leading to nonuniform distribution of magnetic moments along the curvature. Furthermore, we find that waved TMDs show reduced Gibbs free energy for hydrogen adsorption, resulting in enhanced catalytic performance in hydrogen reaction evolution (HER). It is expected that the waved 2D TMDs may find applications into various areas, such as nanodevices and catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据