4.7 Article

Magnetic property (TC ∼ 300 K) originated from InZnP:Ag nano-rods fabricated with noble metal Ag using ion milling method

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 704, 期 -, 页码 552-556

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.017

关键词

Nobel metal; InZnP:Ag nano-rods; Ferromagnetism; Diluted magnetic semiconductor (DMS)

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [NRF-2014R1A2A2A01007718, 2016R1C1 B1014103, 2016R1A6A1A03012877, 2016R1A2B4011706, 2015R1D1A1A01060743, 2015R1A2A2A01004782, 2016952454, 2016R1D1A1B03932295]
  3. Quntum-functional Semiconductor Research Center (QSRC) of Dongguk University
  4. MIST
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A2B4011706, 2016R1D1A1B03932295] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The well aligned InZnP:Ag nano-rods doped with noble metal Ag were fabricated using ion milling method. Results for XPS coincide with results for AES, especially Ag 3d5. The uniformity, density, and height of InZnP:Ag nano-rods were well formed in TEM measurements. In order to clarify the formation of InZnP:Ag nano-rods, SEM was carried out due to the doping of Ag. XRD measurements were performed in order to support the above TEM results, it is confirmed that the lattice was well aligned without distortion and that the nano-rod was a single crystalline zinc blende structure. The variation of FWHM for TAD peaks demonstrates that noble metal Ag is incorporated into InZnP:Ag nano-rods. The trend of FWHM results coincides with the trend of TEM results according to ion milling depth. The clear opening of the ferromagnetic hysteresis loop indicates the formation of ferromagnetic spin coupling interaction in InP:Zn doped with Ag. The FC M-T curve clearly displays that the ferromagnetism of InZnP:Ag persists near 300 K. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据