4.7 Article

Effect of TiN nanoparticles on microstructure and properties of Al2024-TiN nanocomposite by high energy milling and spark plasma sintering

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 726, 期 -, 页码 638-650

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.021

关键词

Ultra-fine grain; Al2024 matrix nanocomposite; TiN nanoparticle; Spark plasma sintering; Mechanical property; Microstructure

资金

  1. Important National Science and Technology Specific Project of China [2012ZX04010-081]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra-fine grained (UFG) Al2024-TiN nanocomposite was fabricated by high energy milling (HEM) and spark plasma sintering (SPS). The effect of TiN content (1, 2, 3 and 4 wt.%) on the morphology and microstructure of as-milled powders was investigated, as well as on the microstructure and properties of as-SPSed samples. Results show that TiN can accelerate the milling process, solution of Cu atoms and deformation of AI(2)CU during milling. Besides, Al grain size of as-milled powders was refined from similar to 87 nm to 30-50 nm after TiN was added, staying steady when TiN exceeded 2 wt.%. Moreover, Al2024-2TiN nanocomposite behaved superior comprehensive properties, showing yield and ultimate strength of similar to 730 MPa and similar to 871 MPa, respectively, which were 185% and 35% higher than those without TiN, and still possessing similar to 10% engineering strain. The Al grain sizes of as-SPSed Al2024 and Al2024-2TiN samples were 576.5 nm and 145.4 nm, respectively, exhibiting 6.6 times and 4 times those of their corresponding milled powders. It is suggested that TiN nanoparticles are helpful to refine Al grains during milling and restrain grain growth during sintering. The high strength of Al2024-TiN nanocomposite was mainly attributed to ultra-fine grains, Orowan strengthening and dislocation strengthening due to TiN nanoparticles. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据