4.7 Article

Coffee productivity and root systems in cultivation schemes with different population arrangements and with and without drip irrigation

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 16-23

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.08.020

关键词

Trickle irrigation; Plantation densities; Coffee plant development; Coffea arabica L.

资金

  1. Brazilian Coffee Research and Development Consortium (CBPD-Cafe)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addressed the vegetative development, yield, and root development of coffee during cultivation in the absence and presence of drip irrigation and in different population arrangements over five years. A 6 x 2 factorial experimental scheme was used with a randomized block design and four replications. The six plantation densities were 1.60 x 0.50m; 1.60 x 0.75 m; 1.60 x 1.00 m; 3.20 x 0.50 m; 3.20 x 0.75 m; and 3.20 x 1.00 m. These plantation densities were divided into irrigated and non-irrigated treatments. The analysis of variance of the interaction between planting density and irrigation revealed absence of synergism in changing the biometric parameters. However, the isolated analysis of the factors showed significant effects of plantation densities, with the arrangement of 1.60 x 0.50 m getting the highest values of plant height and the smallest crown diameter, over the cycles. The adoption of irrigation caused significant effects on biometric parameters, with the irrigation of coffee causing increase in plant height, crown diameter and stalk diameter. The irrigated coffee in the four cycles resulted in a higher processed coffee production, especially when coffee was grown with small row spacing. The irrigated coffee obtained the average yield of 2623 kg ha(-1), while the coffee without irrigation had an average yield of 1026 kg ha(-1). The irrigated treatments had greater root concentrations as compared to the non-irrigated treatments. In addition, the root concentration was greater in the 0-0.5-m layer when smaller row spacing was used. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据