4.7 Article

The FCC to BCC phase transformation kinetics in an Al0.5CoCrFeNi high entropy alloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 710, 期 -, 页码 144-150

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.249

关键词

High entropy alloys; Phase transformation; Kinetics; Microstructure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51571161, 51271151]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2016JQ5003]
  3. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B08040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, thermal expansion method is used to characterize the phase transformation process of Al0.5CoCrFeNi high entropy alloy (HEA), and the FCC-BCC phase transformation kinetics, microstructure and mechanical properties are investigated. Results show that during continuous heating process, three stages of phase transformation process for Al0.5CoCrFeNi HEA are characterized by thermal expansion curves, and the third stage is corresponding to FCC-BCC phase transformation. The FCC-BCC phase transformation kinetics is analyzed using the thermal expansion experiments carried out at different heating rates. The FCC-BCC phase transformed fraction, f, as a function of temperature is determined from thermal expansion curve. The activation energies, Q, determined by KAS model show an increasing trend which is from 144.4 kJ/mol at initial stage (f = 0.2) to 209.2 kj/mol when f = 0.8, indicating the barrier for transformation is increasing. The Avrami exponent, n, determined by modified JMA model, varies with transformed fraction, indicating the FCC-BCC phase transition firstly is interface controlled with decreasing nucleation rate (f < 0.05), and changed to diffusion controlled with an increasing nucleation rate (f < 0.15), then diffusion controlled with decreasing nucleation rate. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the corresponding FCC-BCC phase transformation process are also studied. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据