4.3 Article

The determinants of the intention to continue voluntary football refereeing

期刊

SPORT MANAGEMENT REVIEW
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 242-255

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2019.01.005

关键词

Volunteers; Sport officials; Football; Volunteer process model; Behavioural intentions

资金

  1. Federal Institute of Sports Science (BISp), Germany [IIA1-081801/11-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Competitive sports require a regulating body of referees to enforce the rules for the effective operation of the game. However, the number of referees is generally decreasing, leading to organisational problems at the amateur level. The purpose of this research is to identify the factors that determine the intention to continue voluntary refereeing in the context of football in Germany. Combining several concepts as predictors, including both the antecedents and the experience of volunteering, in this study, the authors extend the understanding about volunteers' intentions to continue their activity and address the research gap regarding the analyses of specific volunteer groups such as referees. By means of an online questionnaire, the authors surveyed voluntary football referees in Germany (n = 4541). Regression analysis reveals the motive of self-orientation, respect shown by athletes, coaches, and spectators towards referees, compatibility of refereeing with one's occupational and private life, perceived organisational support, and referees' satisfaction to predict referees' positive intention to continue with their activity. Simultaneously, experiences of offences during refereeing negatively influence this intention, and younger referees show higher intentions to continue their activity than do older referees. Because volunteer recruitment and retention are expensive, the findings of this study facilitate the improvement of effective retention strategies for the federations responsible for referees. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Sport Management Association of Australia and New Zealand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据