4.7 Article

Microstructure and mechanical behavior of AA2024/B4C composites with a network reinforcement architecture

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 701, 期 -, 页码 554-561

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.133

关键词

Plasma activated sintering; AA2024/B4C composites; Microstructure; Mechanical properties; Strengthening mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572208, 51521001]
  2. 111 Project [B13035]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2013-11-024]
  4. University of California, Irvine through China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We reported an investigation of the influence of B4C contents on microstructure and mechanical behavior of AA2024/B4C composites. In our work, nearly full-dense AA2024/B4C composites with various B4C contents were fabricated by plasma activated sintering. Our results indicated that the B4C particles exhibit a network distribution in the composites with 7.5 wt % and 17.5 wt % B4C particles, adjacent particles of monolithic alloy are continuous or interpenetrated among the B4C particles in the powder boundary region. However, for the composite with 27.5 wt % B4C particles, the adjacent particles of monolithic alloy are interdicted due to the formation of severe aggregations. Improving the content of B4C particles will increase the hardness and compressive yield strength of the composites. However, the yield strength of the composite failed to be further improved when adding too much B4C because of the agglomeration of the reinforcements. With the content of 17.5 wt % B4C, the Vickers hardness and compressive yield strength of the consolidated composites were 203.2 HV and 564 MPa, respectively. In addition, quantitative analysis of the strengthening mechanisms revealed that increasing the weight fraction of the B4C particles results in larger augment in dislocation strengthening and load-bearing strengthening. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据