4.7 Article

The false alarm hypothesis: Food allergy is associated with high dietary advanced glycation end-products and proglycating dietary sugars that mimic alarmins

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 139, 期 2, 页码 429-437

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.040

关键词

Food allergy; alarmins; glycation; advanced glycated end-products; receptor for advanced glycated end-products

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Food Allergy Research and Education
  2. Sean Parker Foundation
  3. Chris Burch Fund
  4. Winston Wolkoff Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of food allergy has increased dramatically in the last few decades in westernized developed countries. We propose that the Western lifestyle and diet promote innate danger signals and immune responses through production of alarmins.'' Alarmins are endogenous molecules secreted from cells undergoing nonprogrammed cell death that signal tissue and cell damage. High molecular group S (HMGB1) is a major alarmin that binds to the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE). Advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) are also present in foods. We propose the false alarm'' hypothesis, in which AGEs that are present in or formed from the food in our diet are predisposing to food allergy. The Western diet is high in AGEs, which are derived from cooked meat, oils, and cheese. AGEs are also formed in the presence of a high concentration of sugars. We propose that a diet high in AGEs and AGE-forming sugars results in misinterpretation of a threat from dietary allergens, promoting the development of food allergy. AGEs and other alarmins inadvertently prime innate signaling through multiple mechanisms, resulting in the development of allergic phenotypes. Current hypotheses and models of food allergy do not adequately explain the dramatic increase in food allergy in Western countries. Dietary AGEs and AGEforming sugars might be the missing link, a hypothesis supported by a number of convincing epidemiologic and experimental observations, as discussed in this article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据