4.6 Article

A bio-inspired highly selective enzymatic glucose sensor using a red blood cell membrane

期刊

ANALYST
卷 145, 期 6, 页码 2125-2132

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9an02421b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (MSIP) [NRF-2019R1A2B5B01070617, NRF-2017R1A6A3A11034311, NRF-2018M3C1B7020722]
  2. Korea University Graduate School Junior Fellow Research Grant
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018M3C1B7020722] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the development of enzymatic glucose sensors, accurate glucose sensing has been a challenging task because of the existence of numerous interfering molecules in the blood. Meanwhile, red blood cells (RBCs) selectively uptake glucose via a membrane protein called glucose transporter-1. In this study, we developed the RBC membrane (RBCM)-coated enzymatic glucose sensors that mimic the glucose uptake. The RBCM-coated sensors were examined via scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and ATR-FTIR. We optimized the glucose permeability of the RBCM filter by controlling the thickness of the filter. The sensing range of the optimized sensor was 1-15 mM, the detection limit was 0.66 mM, and the sensitivity was 2.978 mu A mM(-1). Intriguingly, the RBCM-coated sensor was highly accurate and precise, despite the coexistence of glucose and interfering molecules (e.g., mannose, galactose, ascorbic acid, uric acid, and cysteine). For each interfering molecule, the errors of our sensor were 0.8 to 2.3%, which was 4.8-14.2 times more accurate than the uncoated one. A similar result was verified for a human serum sample containing countless interfering molecules. Also, the sensing performance of the sensor was consistent after 4 weeks of storage. The results suggest that applying RBCM may improve the selectivity of various types of glucose sensors including the continuous monitoring system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据