3.8 Article

In-vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of some varieties citrus grown in Algeria

期刊

ADVANCES IN TRADITIONAL MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 23-34

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13596-019-00379-9

关键词

Antioxidant activity; Antimicrobial activity; Phenolic compounds; Citrus; Juice; Leaves

资金

  1. Laboratory of Natural Products LAPRONA, Abou Bakr Belkaid University, Tlemcen, Algeria
  2. Natural Local Bio-resources Laboratory, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef
  3. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyphenols are scientifically researched molecules because of their multiple biological activities. This study aims to compare the phenolic content and estimate the antioxidant and anti-microbial activities of leaf extracts and juice of ten varieties Citrus fruits grown in Algeria. Antioxidant properties were evaluated by DPPH radical scavenging activity, beta-carotene-linoleic acid system and ferric reducing antioxidant capacity. Antimicrobial activity was carried out using agar well diffusion method. The results showed the highest levels of phenolic compounds in juice and leaves of different part and varieties of plant (*P<0.05). Among all the varieties, C. maxima and C. aurantium presents the highest activity for the three methods cited previously (94.44-91.66% and 95.41-83.84%). On the other hand, antibacterial activity present on the plates was indicated by an inhibition zone surrounding the well containing the juice. The C. Limon and C. aurantium varieties exhibited the highest antimicrobial activity, with inhibition zone ranging from (27.66 +/- 0.58, 24.66 +/- 1.53 mm) followed by grapefruit and mandarin with areas between (23.00 +/- 1.00, 17.66 +/- 0.58 mm) on the isolates used. In this study, whatever the parts of citrus (juice and leaves) have been found to contain higher amounts of phenolics and their efficiency as potent antioxidants and antimicrobial properties was confirmed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据