4.4 Article

Protest Responses and Willingness to Accept: Ecosystem Services Providers' Preferences towards Incentive-Based Schemes

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 801-821

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12211

关键词

Agri-environmental schemes; choice experiment; olive farmers; payments for ecosystem services; protest response; Spain; willingness to accept

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  2. National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA)
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the project SUSTANOLEA [P10-AGR-5892]
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the project MERCAOLI [RTA2013-00032-00-00]
  5. Andalusian Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IFAPA)
  6. European Social Fund (ESF) within the Operative Program of Andalusia
  7. Scottish Government Rural Affairs
  8. Environment Portfolio Strategic Research Programmes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification and treatment of protest responses in stated preference surveys has long been subject to debate. We analyse protest responses while investigating ecosystem services providers' preferences for incentive-based schemes. We use a choice experiment for olive farmers' preferences for agri-environmental scheme participation in southern Spain. Our two main objectives are: first, to identify and discuss a range of possible motives for protest responses that emerge in a WTA context; second, we analyse the impact on WTA estimates of censoring serial non-participation linked to protest or high compensation requirements (very high takers). Using a random parameter logit model in WTA space, we find that the inclusion or exclusion of serial non-participants in the analysis can have a significant impact on marginal and total WTA estimates. Based on the findings, the paper makes recommendations on how to reduce the incidence of protest responses through survey design, regarding the identification of protesters as opposed to very high takers, and regarding the treatment of both groups of respondents for WTA estimation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据