Believers Versus Deniers: The Radicalization of Sports Concussion and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) Science

Unprecedented media coverage of concussion in sport has led to increased fears regarding the potential negative effects of participation in contact sports including North American football and ice hockey. Initial responses of professional sports leagues to implementation of acute concussion management practices and reports of a neurodegenerative condition known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) developing in retired players caused an atmosphere of distrust whereby the leagues were accused of maintaining cover-ups analogous to what had been seen in association with studies of tobacco and smoking. This article reviews the important role that psychology has played in the study of sports concussion and in the establishment of methods currently used to diagnose and track concussion symptoms. Results of existing studies have shown that the neurobiological effects of concussion are rather short-lived with development of persisting symptoms in some individuals associated more with psychosocial factors than underlying physiological effects. With regard to CTE, the status of the science remains preliminary with little definitive information known about its epidemiology or cause. In the midst of the ongoing controversy. a polarized climate has developed in association with concussion and CTE, divided by believers in the dangers of long-term consequences and deniers who question the status of the existing science. The conclusion is that it is important for psychology to extend its scope of study to provide increased understanding of the social factors underlying the current polarized climate while continuing to provide the public with an accurate and reliable account of the existing science.