4.7 Article

Trace-Level Volatile Quantitation by Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry following Headspace Extraction: Optimization and Validation in Grapes

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 65, 期 42, 页码 9353-9359

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03638

关键词

low-level odorants; volatile analysis; wine grapes; DART; ambient ionization

资金

  1. EJ Gallo Winery
  2. NY Wine Grape Foundation Enology Program [I-34]
  3. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Award from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2017-67007-25940]
  4. NIFA [2017-67007-25940, 914502] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ambient ionization mass spectrometric (AI-MS) techniques like direct analysis in real time (DART) offer the potential for rapid quantitative analyses of trace volatiles in food matrices, but performance is generally limited by the lack of preconcentration and extraction steps. The sensitivity and selectivity of AI-MS approaches can be improved through solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with appropriate thin-film geometries, for example, solid-phase mesh-enhanced sorption from headspace (SPMESH). This work improves the SPMESH-DART-MS approach for use in food analyses and validates the approach for trace volatile analysis for two compounds in real samples (grape macerates). SPMESH units prepared with different sorbent coatings were evaluated for their ability to extract a range of odor-active volatiles, with poly(dimethylsiloxane)/divinylbenzene giving the most satisfactory results. In combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), detection limits for SPMESH-DART-MS under 4 ng/L in less than 30 s acquisition times could be achieved for some volatiles [3-isobuty12-methoxypyrazine,(IBMP) and beta-damascenone]. A comparison of SPMESH-DART-MS and SPME-GC-MS.quantitation of linalool and IBMP demonstrates excellent agreement between the two methods for real grape samples (r(2) >= 0.90), although linalool measurements appeared to also include isobaric interference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据