4.6 Article

Influence of interface induced valley-Zeeman and spin-orbit couplings on transport in heterostructures of graphene on WSe2

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 101, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.165436

关键词

-

资金

  1. Concordia University [VB0038]
  2. Concordia University Graduate Fellowship
  3. Colorado State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the electronic dispersion and transport properties of graphene/WSe2 heterostructures in the presence of a proximity induced spin-orbit coupling (SOC) using a low-energy Hamiltonian, with different types of symmetry breaking terms, obtained from a four-band, first and second nearest-neighbour tight-binding (TB) one. The competition between different perturbation terms leads to inverted SOC bands. Further, we study the effect of symmetry breaking terms on ac and dc transport by evaluating the corresponding conductivities within linear response theory. The scattering-independent part of the valley-Hall conductivity, as a function of the Fermi energy E-F, is mostly negative in the ranges -lambda(R) <= E-F and E-F >= lambda(R) when the strength lambda(R) of the Rashba SOC increases except for a very narrow region around E-F = 0 in which it peaks sharply upward. The scattering-dependent diffusive conductivity increases linearly with electron density, is directly proportional to A R in the low- and high-density regimes, but weakens for lambda(R) = 0. We investigate the optical response in the presence of a SOC-tunable band gap for variable E-F. An interesting feature of this SOC tuning is that it can be used to switch on and off the Drude-type intraband response. Furthermore, the ac conductivity exhibits interband responses due to the Rashba SOC. We also show that the valley-Hall conductivity changes sign when E-F is comparable to lambda(R) and vanishes at higher values of E-F. It also exhibits a strong dependence on temperature and a considerable structure as a function of the frequency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据