4.1 Article Data Paper

Dataset on the shooting and rooting ability of Morus alba using waste tea residue derived carbon dots as an alternative of growth plant stimulator

期刊

DATA IN BRIEF
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105345

关键词

WTR-CDs; Plant propagation; Nodal explant; ex vitro

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, RGNF (NFSC) [201718-RGNF-2017-18-SC-MAH-32317]
  2. Brain pool Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [NRF-2019H1D3A2A01057526]
  3. Creative Material Discovery Program [2015M3D1A1068061]
  4. Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019H1D3A2A01057526] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The data article ex vitro (vegetative plant propagation) culture techniques are sustainable alternatives to the large-scale production of economically important plant species. Morus alba is an essential species that is mainly considered to be economically important due to their potential use as silk production, medicine and food. In this work, we evaluated the data of effects of different concentration ofWaste Tea Residue Carbon Dots (WTR-CDs) on the ex vitro growth of morus. This dataset can be beneficial for researchers finding alternative eco-friendly, biodegradable and costfriendly substitute for plant growth stimulator that are helpful for plant propagation during plant production program. Time consuming and low germination ratio of seeds are the most restricting triggers for commercial use for large-scale cultivation of plant species. Use of WTR-CDs in ex vitro culture technology is an appropriate alternative approach for large-scale production of plants within a short period of time. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据