4.2 Article

Condom Catheters versus Indwelling Urethral Catheters in Men: A Prospective, Observational Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 E1-E4

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3180

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Service [IIR 12-395, RCS 11-222]
  2. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center [CIN 13-413]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess complications of condom catheters compared with indwelling urethral catheters, we conducted a prospective cohort study in two Veterans Affairs hospitals. Male patients who used a condom catheter or indwelling urethral catheter during their hospital stay were followed for one month by interview and medical record review. Participants included 36 men who used condom catheters and 44 who used indwelling urethral catheters. At least one catheter-related complication was reported by 80.6% of condom catheter users and 88.6% of indwelling catheter users ( P = .32), and noninfectious complications (eg, leaking urine, pain, or discomfort) were more common than infectious complications in both groups. Condom catheter patients were significantly less likely than indwelling catheter patients to report complications during catheter placement (13.9% vs 43.2%; P < .001). Patients reported approximately three times more noninfectious complications than the number recorded in the medical record. (C) 2020 Society of Hospital Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据