4.7 Article

A multi-decade longitudinal analysis of transportation and land use co-evolution in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton Area

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102696

关键词

Transport accessibility; Urbanization; Panel analysis; The Greater Toronto-Hamilton Area

资金

  1. Ontario Research Fund Research Excellence Fund Round 7, under project iCity: Urban Informatics for Sustainable Metropolitan Growth [ORF-RE07, RE07039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transportation infrastructure networks (TINs), and the accessibility that they provide, are argued to be major determinants of land-use change. However, the spatio-temporal extent of their impact on urbanization is unclear and calls for further investigation. This paper empirically investigates the impact of both road and transit networks on urbanization in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton Area (GTHA) from 1971 to 2016, using a traffic analysis zone (TAZ) level panel database of 17,160 observations. It first documents and measures the magnitude, location and rate of urbanization and TINs' development in the region and in relation to each other using descriptive and buffer analyses. It then estimates the share of transport accessibility in urbanization over time and space using fixed effects panel regression models. Our findings demonstrate the significant extent of the ongoing sprawl, the substantial historical and current difference between the potential transit and car travel times, and the stability of the potential car travel times despite improvements to the road network. They also highlight the importance of urban proximity in prompting urbanization and the decreasing impact of transit improvement on urban development in urban areas and over time. A policy implication is that to encourage transit-oriented development, it is more effective to introduce or reinforce connections to activity centers rather than invest in reducing travel times to reach them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据