4.4 Article

Design factors for reducing ice adhesion

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 21, 页码 2271-2284

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2017.1297588

关键词

Adhesion; ice; roughness; renewable energy; solar; wind; climate; carbon

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between a type of engineering material and the ice adhesion strength while in direct application in icing conditions. Ice adhesion tests were conducted on various materials with different surface conditions. There is an identified need for systematic studies on the effects of varying surface conditions with well-characterized roughness and accurate adhesion measurement. This information is key in understanding the adhering behaviour of ice which is a necessary prerequisite for modelling the behaviour of ice adhesion to other surfaces and for icing prevention. Results show that the type of material will determine, in large, the strength of the ice adhesion between surfaces with similar roughness characteristics and the receding contact angle of water can be used as a predictor of relative ice adhesion. The adhesive strength of ice can be increased or decreased dramatically by means of adjusting the surface roughness with a uniform process. Each material tested exhibits a similar linear relationship. There was a stark contrast in the ice adhesion between the varying materials despite very similar polished surface conditions and static water contact angles. Ice bonded to the glass surface with an adhesion of 1562 +/- 113kPa, and to aluminum at 1039 +/- 117kPa, and stainless steel at 1022 +/- 115kPa, and finally Teflon at only 33 +/- 52kPa and during 80% of trials the ice/substrate interface was broken with no measured adhesion. The information gathered can be used to improve designs for a number of devices needed in cold weather climates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据