4.7 Article

Nano-size porous carbon spheres as a high-capacity anode with high initial coulombic efficiency for potassium-ion batteries

期刊

NANOSCALE HORIZONS
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 895-903

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nh00018c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21703185, 51901013]
  2. leading Project Foundation of Science Department of Fujian Province [2018H0034]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Planning Project [JCYJ20170818153427106]
  4. Double-First Class Foundation of Materials and Intelligent Manufacturing Discipline of Xiamen University
  5. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project of China [2017TP1001, 2018RS3009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hard carbon materials have been recognized as a promising family of anode materials for potassium ion batteries (PIBs), but their practical application is severely hindered due to the inferior initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) and low capacity. Herein, we report our findings in simultaneously improved potassium storage capacity and ICE through the design of nano-size and porous structure and the appropriate selection of electrolytes. Benefiting from the high specific surface area, stable electrode|electrolyte interface, and fast potassium ion and electron transfer, the optimized electrode exhibits a high ICE of up to 68.2% and an outstanding reversible capacity of 232.6 mA h g(-1) at 200 mA g(-1). In particular, superior cycling stability of 165.2 mA h g(-1) at 1000 mA g(-1) and 129.7 mA h g(-1) at 2000 mA g(-1) can be retained after 1500 cycles, respectively. Quantitative analysis reveals that this optimized structure leads to an enhanced surface-controlled contribution, resulting in fast potassiation kinetics and electronic|ionic conductivities, which are regarded as essential features for potassium storage. Our findings in this work provide an efficient strategy to significantly improve potassium storage capacity while maintaining a high ICE for hard carbon electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据