4.8 Article

Active site manipulation in MoS2 cluster electrocatalysts by transition metal doping

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 4459-4472

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9nr10702a

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [686053]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K006061/1, EP/D049245/1, EP/E005918/1, EP/K006061/2, EP/D037794/1, EP/E004563/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of non-platinum group metal catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in water electrolyser devices is essential for their widespread and sustainable deployment. In recent years, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) catalysts have received significant attention as they not only exhibit good electrocatalytic HER activity but also, crucially, acid-stability. However, further performance enhancement is required for these materials to be competitive with Pt and to that end transition metal doping of MoS2 has been explored as a route to further increasing its catalytic activity. In this work, cluster beam deposition was employed to produce controlled cobalt-doped MoS2 clusters (MoS2-Co). We demonstrate that, in contrast to previous observations of performance enhancement in MoS2 resulting from nickel doping (MoS2-Ni), the introduction of Co has a detrimental effect on HER activity. The contrasting behaviours of Ni and Co doping are rationalized by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which suggest that HER-active surface vacancies are deactivated by combination with Co dopant atoms, whilst their activity is retained, or even partially enhanced, by combination with Ni dopant atoms. Furthermore, the adatom dopant-vacancy combination kinetics appear to be more than three orders of magnitude faster in MoS2-Co than for MoS2-Ni. These findings highlight a fundamental difference in the influence of transition metal dopants on the HER performance of MoS2 electrocatalysts and stress the importance of considering surface atomic defects when predicting their behaviour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据