4.6 Article

A Comparison of TDD and FDD Massive MIMO Systems Against Smart Jamming

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 72068-72077

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2987606

关键词

Jamming; MIMO communication; Covariance matrices; Training; Downlink; Channel estimation; Network security; Frequency division duplex (FDD); massive MIMO; physical layer security; smart jamming; time division duplex (TDD)

资金

  1. National Research Foundation through the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP), Korean Government [2017R1A2B3012316]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frequency division duplex (FDD) massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems introduce a large overhead in downlink channel estimation in contrast to the time division duplex (TDD) mode. This overhead results in a considerable spectral efficiency (SE) gap between the FDD and TDD modes. In this paper, we consider the performance of the TDD and FDD massive MIMO systems with a spatially correlated channel in the presence of jamming in the network. We show how a smart jammer can effectively design its attack signal to degrade the network performance in terms of the downlink SE. Since the jammer can obtain different information about the channels in the TDD and FDD modes, two distinct jamming strategies are proposed for each mode. In the numerical results, the performance of both the TDD and FDD modes under the optimized jamming designs are evaluated and compared. Our results show that despite more attention to the TDD mode in current massive MIMO systems, it is more vulnerable to smart jamming attacks compared to the FDD mode which results in a smaller SE-gap between the modes. Furthermore, a countermeasure technique is proposed to combat this jamming attack in both the TDD and FDD modes by estimating the jamming power, grouping users, and allocating power among them. The numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed countermeasure techniques in both the TDD and FDD modes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据