4.4 Article

Temperature increase impacts personality traits in aquatic non-native species: Implications for biological invasion under climate change

期刊

CURRENT ZOOLOGY
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 966-971

出版社

CURRENT ZOOLOGY
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/61.6.966

关键词

Animal personality; Biological invasion; Climate change; Crawfish; Invasive species

类别

资金

  1. Talent Introduction Fund of Tianjin Normal University of China [5RL115]
  2. More Than One Thousand Talents Introduction within Three Years Fund of Tianjin City of China [5KQM110002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change, such as elevated temperatures, may facilitate biological invasion. Aquatic animal systems are more vulnerable to biological invasion when the temperature rises. Animal personality also plays an important role in the possibility of successful establishment of invasive species. However, it is still unclear how personality traits of invasive species will respond to global warming. This study focuses on juveniles of red swamp crawfish Procambarus clarkii, an invasive poikilothermic species with wide distribution throughout the world, and explores how slight temperature increases influence three personality traits (activity, boldness and aggressiveness) of P. clarkii. For each personality, individual variation is to be presented in condition of the same temperature. Individual personality values can significantly increase with the subtle rising of water temperature. Significant correlations among activity, boldness and aggressiveness are found at any temperature stage, and such relationships are maintained at a similar level in the face of different temperatures. It is most likely that significant expressions of personality traits may be an ecological compensation strategy to offset increased metabolic costs when faced with small temperature increases. Aggression syndromes are formed due to stable linkages between personality traits, in order to acquire allopatric resources efficiently and establish a new population in this species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据