4.6 Article

Zero-valent iron/activated carbon microelectrolysis to activate peroxydisulfate for efficient degradation of chlortetracycline in aqueous solution

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 10, 期 33, 页码 19401-19409

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra03639k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LH2019D002]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2572017CA08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tetracycline antibiotics are widely used in human and veterinary medicine; however, their gradual increase in the aquatic environment poses a serious threat to human health and ecosystems. The reactivity of peroxydisulfate (PDS) in the degradation of chlortetracycline (CTC) in aqueous solution using a zero-valent iron/activated carbon (AC) microelectrolysis method (Fe-0-AC/PDS) was investigated by batch experiments. The results showed that the effects of different systems were as follows: Fe-0-AC/PDS > Fe-0/PDS > AC/PDS > Fe-0-AC > AC > Fe-0 > PDS. In the Fe-0-AC/PDS system, the degradation efficiency of CTC could reach 88% under the following optimal experimental conditions: Fe-0 dose of 0.4 g L-1, PDS dose of 2 g L-1, pH of 3 and initial CTC concentration of 50 mg L-1. The presence of Cl-, HCO3- and H2PO4- inhibited the degradation of CTC, while humic acid accelerated the degradation rate of CTC. The mineralization of CTC was evaluated from the TOC, with a value of 31.44% in 7 h. Free radical identification experiments showed that SO4-& x2d9; and O-2(-)& x2d9; were involved in the degradation of CTC. The iron and carbon materials had good reusability, and the degradation rate of CTC was still approximately 70% after four cycles. Finally, the possible mechanism for the degradation of CTC by the Fe-0-AC/PDS systems was discussed. Based on the above conclusions, Fe-0-AC microelectrolysis is a new heterogeneous catalytic method for green and efficient activation of PDS and demonstrates potential applicability in the treatment of wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据